Compared on engine coverage, prompt limits, citation depth, pricing and reporting - with honest takes on who each one is for.
| Tool | Engines tracked | Best for | Starts at |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citations.io | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude | Teams wanting a monthly AI visibility scan + implementation packs | $39/mo |
| Profound | All four majors + Bing Copilot | Enterprise programs with deep prompt sets | Custom |
| AthenaHQ | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude | Agencies running multi-client tracking | $149/mo |
| Otterly | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini | Single-engine deep dives | $29/mo |
| Peec AI | ChatGPT, Perplexity | Small teams on a budget | $19/mo |
Best for: Teams that want a monthly AI visibility scan across all four major engines plus actionable implementation packs out of the box.
Citations.io covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude with a monthly AI visibility scan, with a single 0–100 Visibility Score per engine, share of voice vs. tracked competitors, verbatim answer archive and hallucination alerts. The differentiator is the implementation pack: every gap surfaces a concrete recommendation a content or PR team can ship in the same sprint. From $39/mo. See pricing.
Best for: Enterprise programs with deep prompt sets and large competitive landscapes. Profound positions itself for large enterprise programmes with bespoke onboarding. Pricing is custom; expect a four-figure monthly minimum.
Best for: Agencies running multi-client tracking with white-labelled reports. Covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. From $149/mo.
Best for: Single-engine deep dives, especially Perplexity. From $29/mo.
Best for: Solo operators and small teams on a tight budget. Limited engine coverage but very approachable. From $19/mo.
Monthly AI visibility scans across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. 5-day trial, $5, card required.
Start 5-day trial for $5
